You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
The weak and unlucky died. The strong survived. Now, when people only have 1 or 2 kids, the parents coddle them because if even 1 dies it means the family genes may die out. Kids get coddled, don't grow normally, and end up being "adults" that think a dog is a replacement for procreation.
A dog is a dependant animal, not a human being. The potential contained in both species is nowhere near similar.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] DiscontentedMajority 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
True, but you also have to take into account that your great grandmother was planing on some of them dying as they grew up.
[–] Kick_Start 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
The number that reached adulthood was still far higher than successive generations, the OP's point stands.
[–] AssaultMonkey 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The weak and unlucky died. The strong survived. Now, when people only have 1 or 2 kids, the parents coddle them because if even 1 dies it means the family genes may die out. Kids get coddled, don't grow normally, and end up being "adults" that think a dog is a replacement for procreation.
A dog is a dependant animal, not a human being. The potential contained in both species is nowhere near similar.
[–] shadow332 [S] ago
The whole thing isn't really an accurate argument - more the better to troll with.