You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] thedeadbeatnik ago  (edited ago)

My point was that it removes Ballot Counters, Dominion type counting machines, and people who have access

to ballots who can throw them out or run them several times. I think we can all see paper ballots aren't infallible.

[–] Mcmurdo32 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well, ballot box stuffing is a time honored Democratic Party machine tradition, but as we see now, it cannot be carried out as sneakily as that algorithm for the Domonion machines. I just don't trust any electronic means. There should be a paper ballot representing every tik in any electronic gizmo related to any election. No system will perfectly eliminate cheating. Our goal is to minimize it and make it as hard as possible to do. Treating election fraud as treason with appropriate sentences should also help.

[–] PatEldo5 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Execute a handful of these traitors, and we will have established a viable deterrent. As long as there are no consequences for treason, it will continue to run rampant. It's just that simple.

[–] thedeadbeatnik ago 

Are you going to count them by hand (no computerized counting machine)?

Too many cooks.... The less people involved the safer it will be. Having several counting machines with UBS drives lends itself to corruption.

Without USB drives it has to be connected to the internet.

To Many Counting Machines and Counters.

If you had one point source per state the less room for error. No need for counting the computer automatically counts/tallies.

You can track digitally and require a thumb print with current tech.

[–] tstr ago 

In person, inked thumb, voter ID. This way we know exactly how many ballots there should be. Can't have 200k show up at 4 AM for 1 candidate. There has to be a paper trail to every vote/voter.

Any other method is open to fraud.