You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] mac1221 ago  (edited ago)

In a filling, there are allegations or arguments being made that are asking a court for relief. This petition or defense often contains supporting documentation, such as affidavits, to lend credibility to points being made in the pleading. As each supporting exhibit is systematically introduced within the case document, it is assigned a number in the order which it is introduced. The exhibits are placed in the order of which they are found in the main document and not just randomly assigned. Therefore, having a particular exhibit being numbered as the 17th, is coincidental. Lawyers are not going to arrange a document to make sure an exhibit is assigned a specific number.

[–] ssgrader [S] ago 

in the order of which they are found in the main document and not just randomly assigned


this is exactly what i have been saying. " It was placed into the document submitted in the order they specifically chose "

I proved Oregon did this

by by

[–] mac1221 ago 

You proved nothing. You see deliberation because that is what you want to see. There is a 17th exhibit in all kinds of filings. Does that mean that "Q" was specifically meant for that specific court exhibit to mean something beyond just a simple assignment of numerical order that you are tying to imply with your post? Absolutely not. I have put several court docs together and you are reading way more out of this than what is there. 17/Q most of the time is simply just another number - nothing more.