You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[+]mac12210 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]mac12210 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I really think that this exhibit item being identified as #Q was purely coincidental. You can think what you wish and if you see some meaning behind it, that is for you to decide. As far as the Oregon HB 2020 is concerned, it would depend on the bill assignment sequencing. Since it is in the title itself, that is a different matter and could be intentional. But, in the exhibit number assignment within a legal filing, not so much. The assignment of numbers will depend on where that item is being introduced within the pleadings and is usually introduced in order.
There is a process to how legislation is introduced in a particular chamber, whether on the federal or the state level. Numbers are not randomly assigned. They are numbered according to order they were received in a particular session. Lawmakers could however, plan on introducing a bill that would have a particular number because it is within the sequenced of numbers that will be available when that bill is introduced. They do not pick any numbers they want. There is order.
[+]mac12210 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]mac12210 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
In a filling, there are allegations or arguments being made that are asking a court for relief. This petition or defense often contains supporting documentation, such as affidavits, to lend credibility to points being made in the pleading. As each supporting exhibit is systematically introduced within the case document, it is assigned a number in the order which it is introduced. The exhibits are placed in the order of which they are found in the main document and not just randomly assigned. Therefore, having a particular exhibit being numbered as the 17th, is coincidental. Lawyers are not going to arrange a document to make sure an exhibit is assigned a specific number.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] mac1221 ago (edited ago)
I really think that this exhibit item being identified as #Q was purely coincidental. You can think what you wish and if you see some meaning behind it, that is for you to decide. As far as the Oregon HB 2020 is concerned, it would depend on the bill assignment sequencing. Since it is in the title itself, that is a different matter and could be intentional. But, in the exhibit number assignment within a legal filing, not so much. The assignment of numbers will depend on where that item is being introduced within the pleadings and is usually introduced in order.
[–] ssgrader [S] ago
the house speaker sets what bill goes in what order for voting on.
[–] mac1221 ago
There is a process to how legislation is introduced in a particular chamber, whether on the federal or the state level. Numbers are not randomly assigned. They are numbered according to order they were received in a particular session. Lawmakers could however, plan on introducing a bill that would have a particular number because it is within the sequenced of numbers that will be available when that bill is introduced. They do not pick any numbers they want. There is order.
[–] ssgrader [S] ago
who hands them over in that order?
[–] mac1221 ago (edited ago)
In a filling, there are allegations or arguments being made that are asking a court for relief. This petition or defense often contains supporting documentation, such as affidavits, to lend credibility to points being made in the pleading. As each supporting exhibit is systematically introduced within the case document, it is assigned a number in the order which it is introduced. The exhibits are placed in the order of which they are found in the main document and not just randomly assigned. Therefore, having a particular exhibit being numbered as the 17th, is coincidental. Lawyers are not going to arrange a document to make sure an exhibit is assigned a specific number.