You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] ssgrader [S] ago 

or did wet plan for this doc to be Evidence # Q same as this Oregon HB2020 > https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2020/Introduced ,

Just a coincidence they placed this particular bill as # 2020 which is Paris Climate Accord UN's Agenda 2020 that has been backtracked to 2035 and being backtracked farther.

[–] mac1221 ago  (edited ago)

I really think that this exhibit item being identified as #Q was purely coincidental. You can think what you wish and if you see some meaning behind it, that is for you to decide. As far as the Oregon HB 2020 is concerned, it would depend on the bill assignment sequencing. Since it is in the title itself, that is a different matter and could be intentional. But, in the exhibit number assignment within a legal filing, not so much. The assignment of numbers will depend on where that item is being introduced within the pleadings and is usually introduced in order.

[–] ssgrader [S] ago 

the house speaker sets what bill goes in what order for voting on.

[–] ssgrader [S] ago 

who hands them over in that order?