You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Just a coincidence they placed this particular bill as # 2020 which is Paris Climate Accord UN's Agenda 2020 that has been backtracked to 2035 and being backtracked farther.
[+]mac12210 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]mac12210 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I really think that this exhibit item being identified as #Q was purely coincidental. You can think what you wish and if you see some meaning behind it, that is for you to decide. As far as the Oregon HB 2020 is concerned, it would depend on the bill assignment sequencing. Since it is in the title itself, that is a different matter and could be intentional. But, in the exhibit number assignment within a legal filing, not so much. The assignment of numbers will depend on where that item is being introduced within the pleadings and is usually introduced in order.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] ssgrader [S] ago
or did wet plan for this doc to be Evidence # Q same as this Oregon HB2020 > https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2020/Introduced ,
Just a coincidence they placed this particular bill as # 2020 which is Paris Climate Accord UN's Agenda 2020 that has been backtracked to 2035 and being backtracked farther.
[–] mac1221 ago (edited ago)
I really think that this exhibit item being identified as #Q was purely coincidental. You can think what you wish and if you see some meaning behind it, that is for you to decide. As far as the Oregon HB 2020 is concerned, it would depend on the bill assignment sequencing. Since it is in the title itself, that is a different matter and could be intentional. But, in the exhibit number assignment within a legal filing, not so much. The assignment of numbers will depend on where that item is being introduced within the pleadings and is usually introduced in order.
[–] ssgrader [S] ago
the house speaker sets what bill goes in what order for voting on.
[–] ssgrader [S] ago
who hands them over in that order?