You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
This post takes two unrelated pieces of information and attempts to infer causality, as though somehow Jeff Bezos caused those 1.5 million children to live in homeless shelters. Stupidity being projected as wisdom. It is like saying I am allergic to peanuts and the Georgia Peanut Farmer cabal continues their efforts to kill me by raising peanuts.
[–]Seer1965[S]0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
Not the intent... Try to think (if you are able) about what $74 billion could do to help 1.5 million homeless children... Try to think (if you can) how being deemed an essential business helped bezos greatly while small business were shut down. Wisdom requires an ability to see through some complexity other wise what is put forward is stupid peanut logic
that is a socialist frame of mind. There would not even be 74 billion to discuss if Bezos had not devoted his life to building his business. But somehow, because his was deemed an essential business (and it has proven to be essential during this pandemic), we are supposed to wise enough to condemn Bezos and Amazon for succeeding in adversity, casting aspersion upon them because there are children who are homeless. Go back to Russia you commie.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] toadunka 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
This post takes two unrelated pieces of information and attempts to infer causality, as though somehow Jeff Bezos caused those 1.5 million children to live in homeless shelters. Stupidity being projected as wisdom. It is like saying I am allergic to peanuts and the Georgia Peanut Farmer cabal continues their efforts to kill me by raising peanuts.
[–] Seer1965 [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Not the intent... Try to think (if you are able) about what $74 billion could do to help 1.5 million homeless children... Try to think (if you can) how being deemed an essential business helped bezos greatly while small business were shut down. Wisdom requires an ability to see through some complexity other wise what is put forward is stupid peanut logic
[–] toadunka 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
that is a socialist frame of mind. There would not even be 74 billion to discuss if Bezos had not devoted his life to building his business. But somehow, because his was deemed an essential business (and it has proven to be essential during this pandemic), we are supposed to wise enough to condemn Bezos and Amazon for succeeding in adversity, casting aspersion upon them because there are children who are homeless. Go back to Russia you commie.