You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Yes, this is correct. BUT, what people don't realize is the goal is the create a constitutional crisis... because they want to replace the constitution. The only question is, who's going to replace it (DS or Trump/Military) and with what, exactly?
The constitution is great... it's worked well enough for a long time. But, it's flawed and inadequate for modern times and tech. This war is about who/what comes next... so, don't stay too attached to it.
Our constitution has too much power concentrated into too few people and legislative/judicial entities. It's language is vague, and has been twisted into near meaninglessness but the very courts it proscribes.
And, that's just the start of it's flaws and shortcomings... Now, care to refute or add anything of value to the discussion? Prolly not... thanks for the name-calling, tho... very helpful.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] PyroDaMatchless 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Yes, this is correct. BUT, what people don't realize is the goal is the create a constitutional crisis... because they want to replace the constitution. The only question is, who's going to replace it (DS or Trump/Military) and with what, exactly?
The constitution is great... it's worked well enough for a long time. But, it's flawed and inadequate for modern times and tech. This war is about who/what comes next... so, don't stay too attached to it.
[–] Six_Cents ago
Idiotic statement.
[–] PyroDaMatchless 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Sure... thanks.
Our constitution has too much power concentrated into too few people and legislative/judicial entities. It's language is vague, and has been twisted into near meaninglessness but the very courts it proscribes.
And, that's just the start of it's flaws and shortcomings... Now, care to refute or add anything of value to the discussion? Prolly not... thanks for the name-calling, tho... very helpful.