You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Memo for you. Nothing gov't does is unconstitutional anymore. The supreme court just redefined previously understood words in the Elector decision. So no word in the Constitution is safe.
[–]Polic3Stat30 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I'm now prepared for Whitmer's slave mask order. I have an n95 mask I wrote COVID LIE on in big black letters. I wrote it so COV(I)D is vertical and L(I)E uses the I horizontally. Looks like an inverted cross. If a business tells me to put on a mask when I come in, on it goes.
It opens up the option for employers to require it by even having legislation on the books. Employers can strongly suggest that employees get it and if they don't, fire them for some other arbitrary reason. Before this legislation, even asking an employee to be chipped was a lawsuit.
"Critics note that this law also grants perfect legal framework for an employer to microchip their employees in the first place. With this bill on record fans of the technology will have statutes to lean on when they impose their plans. By having rules of prohibition it’s inherent that without exceeding those limits, that the chipping is allowed by law."
If there was no law against it before, I sincerely doubt there was anything preventing employers from requiring micro chipping this entire time. Besides, this is not the end all be all of this legislation. Certainly some company will push for micro chipping within the permissible confines of this legislation, but will be faced with an appeal to some governing body thus creating even further restrictions and interpretations through case law. This argument requires faith in the judicial/administrative system, so go ahead and laugh.
Additionally, if this somehow does contemplate a governmental allowance or furtherance of mandatory micro chipping, then a constitutional argument could probably be made regarding the right to privacy under the 4th Amendment. Don't count on it, however, because the SCOTUS has been issuing crazy rulings lately in an attempt for Roberts to appease the liberal masses and "depoliticize" the appearance of the Court.
Sort: Top
[–] ALIENS2222 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago (edited ago)
Those who give up liberty for a little temporary safety and security will have neither liberty or security. - Ben Franklin
[–] 45andQ 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
The DOJ needs to shut this shit down. It's obviously completely unconstitutional.
[–] Merkava_4 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The DOJ has already been infiltrated by the deep state and has been for quite some time. The only thing that will stop this is blood and bullets.
[–] tjliberty69 ago
Memo for you. Nothing gov't does is unconstitutional anymore. The supreme court just redefined previously understood words in the Elector decision. So no word in the Constitution is safe.
[–] patriot2008 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Time for all you patriots to take action.
[–] Merkava_4 ago
Where do I sign up?
[–] Polic3Stat3 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
I'm now prepared for Whitmer's slave mask order. I have an n95 mask I wrote COVID LIE on in big black letters. I wrote it so COV(I)D is vertical and L(I)E uses the I horizontally. Looks like an inverted cross. If a business tells me to put on a mask when I come in, on it goes.
[–] bcboncs 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The microchip bill protects the workforce from employers requiring them.
...that's a good thing.
[–] Swo1ested 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It opens up the option for employers to require it by even having legislation on the books. Employers can strongly suggest that employees get it and if they don't, fire them for some other arbitrary reason. Before this legislation, even asking an employee to be chipped was a lawsuit.
[–] WillGreeley 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Microchipping people hasn’t got one thing ‘good’ about it!!
It’s unconstitutional also!
[–] i_scream_trucks 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
.... its good that the legislation bans it is what theyre sayng....
[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Governors can't make laws. Mandate can be ignored.
[–] ButtersThatsMe 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
But if course Whittmore won’t get chipped.
[–] Youtheperson 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
"Critics note that this law also grants perfect legal framework for an employer to microchip their employees in the first place. With this bill on record fans of the technology will have statutes to lean on when they impose their plans. By having rules of prohibition it’s inherent that without exceeding those limits, that the chipping is allowed by law."
If there was no law against it before, I sincerely doubt there was anything preventing employers from requiring micro chipping this entire time. Besides, this is not the end all be all of this legislation. Certainly some company will push for micro chipping within the permissible confines of this legislation, but will be faced with an appeal to some governing body thus creating even further restrictions and interpretations through case law. This argument requires faith in the judicial/administrative system, so go ahead and laugh.
Additionally, if this somehow does contemplate a governmental allowance or furtherance of mandatory micro chipping, then a constitutional argument could probably be made regarding the right to privacy under the 4th Amendment. Don't count on it, however, because the SCOTUS has been issuing crazy rulings lately in an attempt for Roberts to appease the liberal masses and "depoliticize" the appearance of the Court.
No job is worth doing this to yourself.
[–] WillGreeley ago
Run away as fast as possible. Walk away from everything! Escape to another state now!!
Tell any Christian what and why you are running and they will help you!! R U N