Q stated that the first arrest would shock the world. Former President Bill Clinton would surely shock the world. Also, everyone knows he is a sexual deviant, hence his arrest would be shocking solely because he is an ex-president but not so much shocking because of his past sexual exploits.
I'm merely spit balling here, but it seems that Q is making a point of including Slick Willy in several recent posts.
NOTE: The reason I do not believe it will be Prince Andrew's arrest that shocks the world is all of the issues that come with the United States charging a British citizen, especially a Royal, and wanting to bring him to the US to face crimes against children. I think that before we can arrest big-wigs from around the world, we must first clean our own house.
Thoughts?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Six_Cents [S] ago
Trump arresting former president and darling of the left, Bill Clinton, "is not shockworty"? Really, you think that??
[–] 24Trilionbucks ago
I say that because it is already established that Bill is such a pervert. He cannot go out in public without someone shouting he is a rapist. Hillary is still functioning, even stalking the 11th hour nomination, still viable player. Taking her out would leave the Dems with no viable candidate since the Clinton machine engineered it that way. It would virtually guarantee that Trump would essentially run unopposed.
[–] Six_Cents [S] ago (edited ago)
Can't arrest Hillary now, it would look like it was done for political reasons, no matter how guilty everyone knows she is. This would taint every other arrest also. It aint gonna be Hillary.