Q stated that the first arrest would shock the world. Former President Bill Clinton would surely shock the world. Also, everyone knows he is a sexual deviant, hence his arrest would be shocking solely because he is an ex-president but not so much shocking because of his past sexual exploits.
I'm merely spit balling here, but it seems that Q is making a point of including Slick Willy in several recent posts.
NOTE: The reason I do not believe it will be Prince Andrew's arrest that shocks the world is all of the issues that come with the United States charging a British citizen, especially a Royal, and wanting to bring him to the US to face crimes against children. I think that before we can arrest big-wigs from around the world, we must first clean our own house.
Thoughts?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] skidder 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The problem with arresting Hillary or Obama is that it will be seen as political. Soros comes to mind, perhaps Bill Gates. I can't think of too many people within the U.S. that would be a "shock" other than the ones mentioned.
[–] Manolis_Gledsodakis 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I'd like it to be Billie Gates. She's a mass murderer and really deserves to go down. A long way down.
[–] bansai-pomisan ago
@skidder, don't forget, both - Hillary and Obama have comitted treason, which would take them before a military tribunal . So that nobody could blame it to Trump , if the military arrests Obama , because of his action against general Flynn