You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] Sirnotabot 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No one has a right to housing. There are communities all over the U.S. where you can purchase a home for next to nothing. Are you saying people can't save $600 or less, a little extra for bus fare, and aren't willing to do some DIY or find a job elsewhere? There are so many jobs available at the moment, no one should be unemployed and wages have never been better. It took me seconds.

If someone has lost everything due to fire or natural disaster, or everything due to a downturn in the economy, then yes, a safety net is required, but if people are insisting they want to live in California specifically, and can't afford a home, why should the tax payer pay for it?

3
-3

[–] Reymrgapurple [S] 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

that statement is whats wrong with humanity.

0
1

[–] Specific_Fox 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No, he's right. If people are given things for free they don't learn to appreciate anything and quickly they feel entitled to everything. This is anti-evolutionary and creates useless stupid people with no motivation who think they have a right to be a burden to others. Victim mentality on steroids. I was probably attacked by the homeless people because they're psychotic and know they can get away with it because of idiots who feel sorry for them and protect them and call me the bad guy for getting in the way of their swinging fists. This is why socialism destroys societies - it's an anti-social situation.

0
0

[–] Sirnotabot ago 

Good thing I'm not a communist ... but then, communism and socialism represent the worst of humanity. Perhaps you would like to elaborate on why those working should provide homes to people who do not want to, or illegals? That's the socialist position.