You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
3

[–] TheFuglyAmerican 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I caught that too and would have pointed that out but you did a fine job stating the obvious. There was no demand to close the investigation, just a warning, telling them holding the info back from the public (stonewalling) has a time limit now. Tick, tick, tick ...

Also, playing Devil's advocate here, a stall tactic that has always worked well was to keep an investigation that was going to lead to no where open for years until public attention wanes and they quietly sweep it under the rug, in the mean time no dirt from FOIA requests get to the public in the interest of "protecting the investigation" which was just stonewalling to begin with.

0
1

[–] whohat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Agree with the stalling part. For sure they know they will lose the Flynn Case if not in Court absolutely in Appeals Court for withholding evidence required to be shared with the defense,,,