You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] Intlrnt2 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I can’t answer your question with the specifics you seek, but I can share my perspective.

But first, your claim: ”I do not doubt this movement . . . BUT”, followed by, and adjacent to a series of expressions of doubt. I have no quarrel with you doubting or not. Most people are Q doubters. I see no shame in that. I take issue with folks expressing absolute belief (“no doubt”) juxtaposed against expressions of doubt (”but”) in the same sentence.

Regarding the perspective I mentioned, consider the magnitude of the task at hand. Truly international in scope, access to almost unlimited funding and deeply invested people in very powerful positions, untold numbers of leveraged individuals, secret pardons and NPAs in place, and a goal of bringing it ALL down in a manner that crushes it and severely inhibits its resurgence.

Then consider that we get ONE shot to get it right. Cases need to be air tight. The finest defense attorneys money can buy will need to be defeated in court. Repeatedly.

Considering that, and dealing with frustrations similar to yours, I have adopted the following perspective to guide my consideration as events unfold:

  • I accept that the scope of the problem is far more vast than I know.

  • I accept that Q/Q+ has access to intel and resources far more comprehensive and effective than I know.

  • I accept that ‘The Plan’ is designed, modified, and implemented by strategic thinkers with skills evolved beyond my ability to fully appreciate.

  • I believe there are countless ops, ongoing, behind the scenes, 24/7/365.

  • I accept that I will not be informed of any operations prior to or during implementation, and many even after successful completion.

Keeping those beliefs in mind, I find it easier to ’Trust The Plan’. The most important of those three words being TRUST.

I do not promote blind faith. Q/Q+ have earned my trust. I trust the plan. That trust mitigates my frustration with pacing - somewhat.

0
0

[–] RedPilledin89 ago 

I meant to comment earlier but wanted to express my total agreement as well as how well you articulated this often missed point. The scope and assets (both in human and capital) that we are up against is absolutely staggering to the mind and hard for most to conceive. IE: Where did the missing 22 Trillion go (~Catherine Austin Fitts)?

Thank you Patriot for getting this out there!

0
0

[–] Intlrnt2 ago 

Peace.

0
0

[–] 102476reg [S] ago 

Much of this is up to speculation

0
0

[–] Intlrnt2 ago  (edited ago)

Much of this is up to speculation.

Interesting opinion. I choose my words carefully. After a review of my comment I can concede the following to be within the definition of ”speculation”:

  • “Then consider that we get ONE shot to get it right. Cases need to be air tight.”

Please support your assertion by offering some ”specific examples” of the portions of my comment you find speculative.