You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] time3times 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thank you for cataloguing these things. The research and writing must have been dreadfully boring. I can't even bring myself to read it all. I'd suggest you copy it and post it again every month or so.

Option A: SB2 is well-intentioned and occasionally right in an approximate way. The most interesting conclusions "he" has arrived at, since back in the reddit days, were ideas that were already in the air anyway. He could be self-deluding and trying really hard to make some contribution to this cause that he has an honest appreciation for. In my view anyone who tells you they are a brain is too self-aggrandizing. But I have always given him the benefit of the doubt and over time just quit paying him any attention. Cuz how the freck can we know for sure who anyone really is on these boards?

Option B: From the earliest months of the Q thing, some reneg has come around and tried to fool most of the people some of the time with inconsistent number games and a bunch of "hey guys". The result was a fair bit of distraction and time wasted on pedantic posts that NEVER had any succinct TLDR caption. Some of the people get on board the SBtrain most of the time and it still keeps chuggin', even though most of its best results are things that were already suspected, like with the Corsi stuff. Maybe some chunky SJW tech chick in Baltimore is making a meagre living churning the SB2 stuff out, laughing all the while because if you add up the letters of S+B+2 you get 23 which is significant to the satanic temple of psycho youth and if you reverse SB2 you get TooBullShitty. Cuz how the fleck can we know for sure who anyone is on these boards?

0
1

[–] pby [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Option B and love the use of the gematria calculator and the derived value for SB2. That is how it is done.

0
0

[–] pby [S] ago 

I love researching. :)