You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
4

[–] ideologicidal 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

In my read, surveillance actions require a predicate; that is, evidence or probable cause justifying the breach of Constitutionally guaranteed privacy (4A). Barr is saying spying occurred, and it might have been legit if it were predicated/based/supported by evidence, and that evidence might exist, but he (Barr) hasn't seen it.

But a lawfag, I am not

0
2

[–] docksofthebay [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Excellent, Ideologicidal!

Plain English does not seem to be a strong suit for BARR. His words were addressed to members of Congress, but they need to be understood by the average citizen to be effective.

These Hearings clearly have two audiences. The important audience is the voting public. BARR needs to make sure he is clearly understood if he is supporting POTUS efforts to educate the public as a lead in to taking judicial action on the Coup participants.