You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
If someone can get charged with “receiving stolen property” for whatever the stolen item was, Avenatti along with everyone else who takes stolen classified material should be charged too. The normal guy always gets screwed but if you have a few bucks different set of rules
view the rest of the comments →
[–] LickAlottapuss 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
If someone can get charged with “receiving stolen property” for whatever the stolen item was, Avenatti along with everyone else who takes stolen classified material should be charged too. The normal guy always gets screwed but if you have a few bucks different set of rules
[–] whohat [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
And that is what the charge should be
[–] Paladin_Diver 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The NYT most certainly can be held accountable if they printed the info. Did they? I don't recall.
PS. Love the dinosaur handle.