If RGB is gone and Coney-Barrett is confirmed, there will be 6 Catholics on the court.
Many are connected to Jesuit institutions. Is their Catholicism a moral or political fact?
Are they loyal to the Papacy or to the US Constitution, and real Christian faith??????
If you think this question about loyalty to the Papacy is absurd, or not a real issue, you don't know what Jesuits are.
Furthermore you have not learned about the origins of Washington D.C. which used to be the town of Rome. The Potomac River was called the Tiber. When Washington D.C. was founded, it was called "Rome on the Potomac" and there was a massive international Catholic influence...
You must read judge Dale's, The Great American Adventure.
Do the research.
Current Catholics
-
John Roberts
-
** Sonia Sotomayor** ( is publically a Catholic but many consider her a "crypto-jew". Given what we know, is there a difference?)
-
Neil Gorsuch (was raised a Catholic, studied with a famous Catholic scholar of law, John Finnis, although now his family goes to an Episcopal Church in Colorado. Remember Episcopals accept all the doctrines and rituals of Catholacism but is supposedly removed from the Papacy because it is the American version of the Church of England. Today England is unified with the Vatican and we are a long way from Henry VIII)
-
Clarence Thomas
-
Brett Kavanaugh
-
Amy Coney-Barrett
I am not prejudiced against any decent practicing person of religion or traditional Catholicism as such. But unlike Protestantism, Catholicism is a political and moral institution.
Where are all the Protestants? Why are their no Protestants. Its all Catholics and Jews as many have pointed out? In an age in which we are obsessing with proportionate representation, this over-representation is totally disproportionate.
Any thoughts on Why? and What this means about their allegiances?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Habakkuk212 ago (edited ago)
In my opinion, one's moral compass is made evident by one's walk. The schools attended are not a reliable predictor. John Roberts cannot be trusted because he twisted the clear statement of the law that the Obamacare individual mandate penalty was not a tax, and said it was a tax, all in order to accommodate Obama. He is willing to twist the law to achieve a political outcome.
In contrast, Clarence Thomas is as straight up and honest as can be hoped for. I think he walks before the Lord with integrity. And as for Sotomayor, what evidence is there that any Catholic or Christian values remain in her? Her track record indicates that she cares not one whit for the sanctity of human life or moral purity or marital fidelity. She votes in whatever direction the political winds carry her. Catholics and Protestants alike who fear the Lord and love the Lord, walk with moral allegiance to the Lord and with national allegiance to our Constitution.