You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
[+]MajorIce0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]MajorIce0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
I'm not saying I trust Roberts but don't rely on Politico's article alone. It is essentially click bait. Here is one that is much more factual and has material to back the content.
The Politico article does not convey anything but the reporter's opinion wrapped with teed-bits from the stay and reference to underlying case. There is a potential SCOUTS level issue relating to Law and Grand Jury (US Court) jurisdiction against a foreign government. Roberts is in charge of the 10th District Court and although it is true that SCOTUS can chose not to hear a case, the foreign company (owned by foreign state) filed a sealed appeal to SCOUTS citing passed law.
The Politico article is written to leave reader with impression and little else.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] MajorIce ago (edited ago)
I'm not saying I trust Roberts but don't rely on Politico's article alone. It is essentially click bait. Here is one that is much more factual and has material to back the content.
SCOTUS might hear a secret case about a grand jury subpoena
The Politico article does not convey anything but the reporter's opinion wrapped with teed-bits from the stay and reference to underlying case. There is a potential SCOUTS level issue relating to Law and Grand Jury (US Court) jurisdiction against a foreign government. Roberts is in charge of the 10th District Court and although it is true that SCOTUS can chose not to hear a case, the foreign company (owned by foreign state) filed a sealed appeal to SCOUTS citing passed law. The Politico article is written to leave reader with impression and little else.