You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
I agree with this logic - whether it is by recuseal or just a "no" vote. Roberts is setting Trump up for a 4-1-4 loss or a 4-4 no decision (affirm the lower court). This is a real POS exchange by the 2. But it is what it is. The Fucking DS is everywhere. Look at ObamaCare. 60 votes no then bingo - Oh its ok. Justice Roberts. /// In other news, any recent health care reports on Justice Ginsberg?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] HenryCabotLodge ago
I agree with this logic - whether it is by recuseal or just a "no" vote. Roberts is setting Trump up for a 4-1-4 loss or a 4-4 no decision (affirm the lower court). This is a real POS exchange by the 2. But it is what it is. The Fucking DS is everywhere. Look at ObamaCare. 60 votes no then bingo - Oh its ok. Justice Roberts. /// In other news, any recent health care reports on Justice Ginsberg?