You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Submissions should be about Q drops or a subject that has been mentioned by Q. Meta posts about Voat or the community are generally off-topic & subject to removal as unmentioned by Q; use submail for concerns or questions.
Freedom of speech is your right. Being a dick is our reason to remove this content. This includes concern-trolling; drama, gossip, or posts about other users; personal attacks; attacks on the community.
Voat Rules
Content violates spam guidelines
Content contains or links to content that is illegal
Content contains personal information that relates to a Voat users real world or online identity
Under the law of armed conflict, do you agree with the following statement, that if a person is detained who is properly identified to accepted legal procedures under the law of armed conflict as a part of the enemy force, there is not requirement based on a length of time that they be returned to the battle or released? In other words, if you capture a member of the enemy force, is it your understanding of the law that you have to, at some period of time, let them go back to the fight?
Drop 2380 discussed military law v civilian law then Enemy Combatant.
Who cares? Lindsay Graham always talks about enemy combatants. Did a purge happen in 2009 or 2010 or 2013? What about 2016 and 2017? No, it didn't and his asking again is no indication a purge will occur in 2018.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Rocky_Bindhamer ago (edited ago)
Did you not listen to Lindsey Graham talking to Brett Kavanqh about "Enemy Combatants" and if it could pertain to US citizens in wartime?
Kavanaugu said yes
Why would Graham bring that up?
Drop 2380 discussed military law v civilian law then Enemy Combatant.
You don't comprehend the sign up significance? What ever. I'm done with you. Believe what you want to believe.
[–] Are_we__sure ago (edited ago)
Dunno. Probably the same reason he wanted the NYC terrorism suspect to be held as an enemy combatant in 2017?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?436680-1/senator-graham-york-terrorist-suspect-treated-enemy-combatant
and in 2016? https://www.nytimes.com/live/new-york-explosion/senator-graham/
and i Boston in 2013?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?312311-1/senator-graham-boston-marathon-bomber
Probably the same reason he asked Sotomayor that question in 2009?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/14/AR2009071402782.html?noredirect=on
and Kagan in 2010?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4755129/graham-asks-kagan-enemy-combatant
Who cares? Lindsay Graham always talks about enemy combatants. Did a purge happen in 2009 or 2010 or 2013? What about 2016 and 2017? No, it didn't and his asking again is no indication a purge will occur in 2018.