Archived Expert claims more discrepancies found on Chritine Fords letter (thegatewaypundit.com)
submitted ago by LakotaPride
Posted by: LakotaPride
Posting time: 2.2 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 12/25/2018 10:00:00 AM
Views: 342
SCP: 55
56 upvotes, 1 downvotes (98% upvoted it)
Archived Expert claims more discrepancies found on Chritine Fords letter (thegatewaypundit.com)
submitted ago by LakotaPride
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
The article points out all sorts of grammatical errors which should never be on a letter, written by a PhD, regarding the most important event of her lifetime, and entered in the national historical record.
Random capitalization syndrome...
Grammar is important. It's the difference between "helping your uncle Jack, off a horse" and "helping your uncle jack off a horse".
[–] Jaycephus 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The one is killing his horse (for mercy, hopefully), and the other is perverted.
I prefer to "help Uncle Jack off of his horse."
;)
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Don't forget the comma. Don't wanna sound like Christy "the lying whore" Ford, do we?
[–] LakotaPride [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
all Great valid points Patriot. great comparison on grammar. had me laughing.we pretty well know what the Democrats are doing with the horse.
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Feinstein is saying she can't guarantee she will show. Wondering if Ford will off herself accidentally with a red scarf or something like that. Booby prize for the left. As Kavanaugh is confirmed, the despicable Leftists will announce her "suicide" and taint his confirmation.
[–] Jaycephus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There are also shifts in tense, basic mistakes of nomenclature, a serious time-line issue of when the letter was mailed, received, and acted-upon, and the letter mentions the desire that it be kept confidential three times... so where is the government form to release the letter from confidentiality?
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I don't think there is any technical reason it has to be kept confidential. It's not classified and it isn't protected by attorney-client prison. And I sincerely doubt there are NDAs in place.
Either this PhD is a complete nitwit (very possible) or the letter was written by someone with very poor writing skills. What surprises me is that many people in the decision chain to release the "redacted" letter, who have such a poor grasp of written English.
[–] Jaycephus ago
Oh, another point in the logic was that someone who was supposedly assaulted did not refer to Kavanaugh by name in the beginning, but only as "the current nominee to the Supreme Court," a phrase that screams "form letter," and is oddly impersonal for an acquaintance of Kavanaugh, and who goes on to allege to have been assaulted by him. The point being that it might be fake, or it might be a doctored version of the actual letter that a person might have sent.
[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I don't know about a "form" letter, given that this is a pretty unique situation. I'm chalking it up to an idiot intern. That letter is a HOT potato. There is no way Ford, Feinstein or any senior staffer would write it. Some low level dipshit with a Silicon Valley education (aka Commie education) wrote it as they trembled. Plausible deniability. I'm surprised it wasn't cut and paste like a ransom letter.
Adding - Any victim would NAME their accuser.