You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
9

[–] quietriot1967 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

It was nice to see them overwhelm the host, BUT, to me, the ladies contradicted themselves. They all raised their hands saying they believe BK's statement of innocence, but then they talk about it as if it happened in some form or fashion, but was no big deal. It either happened or it didn't happen. I believe it didn't happen. He said he was NOT at the party.

0
2

[–] theclarinetist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I don't see anything wrong with arguing both sides, ie, I see no evidence to believe this happened, but even if it DID happen, it's not a problem because of x, y, z.... However, it should be made clear than any arguments about any alleged event is completely hypothetical. Here it does seem that they are discussing it as though it did happen...

If we assume he will be confirmed (not assured in my mind, but for the sake of argument) and that the dems are just pushing this for #metoo talking points, it is essential from their POV that the narrative be that he DID do it and the repubs just didn't care. For this reason I agree with you that it needs to be made very clear that there is as of now no compelling evidence that this even occurred at all.

0
1

[–] Biloxigyu 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

GEEEEESH, all this about NOTHING! At 17, I would have stuck my pecker in a knothole in a tree trunk!

0
0

[–] quietriot1967 ago 

Thanks for the response, patriot.