You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
I'd assume he's likely referencing climate change given that this is Voat in spite of the the fact that there are twodifferent pages that exclusively discuss, at length, climate change denial.
I've no love for Wikipedia, but I do think the scientific topics are still at least decent introductions to topics. They have barriers to entry in the form of knowledge so you generally avoid the low brow social media warriors taking over the pages.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] mort ago
Do you have any examples of scientific wikipedia articles which present a one sided view, which you think is wrong?
[–] rwbj 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I'd assume he's likely referencing climate change given that this is Voat in spite of the the fact that there are two different pages that exclusively discuss, at length, climate change denial.
I've no love for Wikipedia, but I do think the scientific topics are still at least decent introductions to topics. They have barriers to entry in the form of knowledge so you generally avoid the low brow social media warriors taking over the pages.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago