You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Oh but how could we possibly scrutinize the existing closed platform for the truth in their claim? It's probably easier to just trust Father nVidia, let's just go with that instead. :)
Not that I'm standing up for NVidia, but if it were AMD, they wouldn't even support the previous generation of cards. (AMD driver support lifetime is a joke)
NVidia provides fast and functional drivers for Linux that continue to work for years, while AMD abandons cards quickly and Intel graphics performance on Linux trails Windows by a mile.
Sort: Top
[–] syntaxian 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago
I wouldn't be surprised if they just don't want their old cards to run any faster if Vulcan reaches that point.
[–] 2face-Maze 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Ding ding ding!
Oh but how could we possibly scrutinize the existing closed platform for the truth in their claim? It's probably easier to just trust Father nVidia, let's just go with that instead. :)
[–] 84626433832795028841 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago (edited ago)
This is the second reason why drivers should be open source, the first being security of course.
[–] ineedbettername 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Doesn't matter, someone like Tweakforce might be able to spin a homebrew version of the drivers with Vulkan support.
[–] skidmark-steve ago
Not that I'm standing up for NVidia, but if it were AMD, they wouldn't even support the previous generation of cards. (AMD driver support lifetime is a joke)
NVidia provides fast and functional drivers for Linux that continue to work for years, while AMD abandons cards quickly and Intel graphics performance on Linux trails Windows by a mile.