You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
8

[–] 234v234v23v23423 2 points 8 points (+10|-2) ago 

and heavily censored, they have been caught retouching pictures they could not explain...

0
4

[–] dingus 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Do you have any specific examples of them "retouching pictures that they could not explain"?

0
0

[–] 234v234v23v23423 ago 

0
2

[–] strongdoctor 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I've only ever heard of NASA retouching images to fix artifacting and/or improve them visually.

0
0

[–] 234v234v23v23423 ago 

"artifacting" being the key word... their changes would be completely silent (no notice of change, and they reuse the same filenames...) if it wasn't for the wayback machine...

1
1

[–] TheHammer 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Are you trying to say the moon landing was a hoax?

1
2

[–] sparkybear 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I think he's saying Aliens

1
-1

[–] 234v234v23v23423 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

No, but it probably was, at least for Apollo 11, the post flight conference is some hilarious shit, three uncomfortable idiots reading a script (and i really mean idiots, these people have below 100 IQ)... hell they can't tell the top and bottom of the LEM, they can't remember seeing stars from the surface of the moon (how the fuck do you miss that ?!?! looking at the lunar soil 24/7? Or being in a studio in Hollywood?), and they don't seem even remotely excited about telling the world about their adventure, Armstrong at some point even looks like he is going to break but he holds it together... we might have been to the moon, but I strongly doubt Neil Armstrong and cie did.

0
0

[–] Tantalus ago 

Proof?

0
0

[–] 234v234v23v23423 ago