0
14

[–] rocket_robin_hood 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

I cant read this crap, he keeps calling it Vista 10. DX

0
2

[–] patentedenemy 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Roy Schestowitz is a name synonymous with sensationalism. As much as I share his utter hatred of Microsoft, he fails at presenting himself in a way that people will pay attention to his opinions.

0
8

[–] ttyy 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

If he wants to be taken seriously he should have used the real name of the OS.

0
2

[–] donotreply 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I completely understand why he calls it "Vista 10"... I worked on upgrading computers when Vista came out and I thought 8 was the Vista of the teens(2010's) but I think 10 will be worse... so I get it. Vista was the new way to do things, was going to make life easier and better, well thankfully it lasted 18 months and 7 came out, which was the best of Vista and XP. 10 is not the best of 7 and 8/8.1... 10 IS Vista 10.. a new piece of shit that is not the best of previous versions but a step towards mainframe with nothing owned by you the end user, nothing stored on your personal computer, all in the "cloud", all rented and costing a fee to access. Soon you will be paying a monthly fee for using your laptop, access your pictures, typing your papers, checking your email, seeing whats in your bank account. Once you are moved to Onedrive and Microsoft has access to all it was become limited access, then pay for access...

0
2

[–] LordHumongus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

People like this are why other OS can't get traction. Poorly written articles make you question the author's points.

0
2

[–] 1867714? [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Marketing that works, engineering that doesn't.

0
11

[–] KyJoCaThe2nd 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

I have a hard time taking a critical article seriously if it can't even get the name of the software it's critiquing right.

0
1

[–] Kookus 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There's a difference between not being able to get it right, which may be the result of incompetence, and purposefully writing it incorrectly, which, in this case, is the result of satire.