[–] wipeyournose 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

i don't understand that article. bottom line, if website owners are going to cull and censor content, they need to be held liable for the content they host. If they provide an open platform free from censorship, then they should be protected

[–] Zestyclose_Marketing 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

What if pedophikes start raiding that freedom of speeks site?

[–] libman 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

There are technological non-governmental solutions to bad behavior on the Internet.

No combination of 1's and 0's should be illegal.

[–] TAThatBoomerang 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That's actually a very simple perspective that I haven't heard before. Thanks for sharing.

[–] wincest1 ago 

Perfectly stated !

[–] libman ago 

Standing up to the """net neutrality""" commies was the #1 thing that caused me to change my opinion of Trump in the positive direction.