You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[+]Balrogic0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]Balrogic0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
So long as they're merely showing you what's out there, sure. If they're actively trying to censor some things associated with liabilities that ought not apply to someone merely showing what's out there then they're taking responsibility for the content they publish.
Since Google does censor and fudge search results, they've accepted responsibility for the content they publish. The ruling got it wrong.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Balrogic ago (edited ago)
So long as they're merely showing you what's out there, sure. If they're actively trying to censor some things associated with liabilities that ought not apply to someone merely showing what's out there then they're taking responsibility for the content they publish.
Since Google does censor and fudge search results, they've accepted responsibility for the content they publish. The ruling got it wrong.
[–] Krutonium ago
I would argue that it shouldn't apply, since if google could afford to and could ignore the US Gov, they wouldn't censor.