Archived The Lie Behind the Lie Detector (Free Ebook on How to Pass or Beat a Polygraph Test) (antipolygraph.org)
submitted ago by 403
Posted by: 403
Posting time: 2.1 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/11/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 1119
SCP: 62
64 upvotes, 2 downvotes (97% upvoted it)
Archived The Lie Behind the Lie Detector (Free Ebook on How to Pass or Beat a Polygraph Test) (antipolygraph.org)
submitted ago by 403
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 0100100-100110 ago
If you could make yourself believe a lie then all that new stuff is no issue. I suspect you would have to be boderline or true psychopath to pass the new ones.
[–] TheTrigger 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Not really. Teach yourself, "method acting". It's the art of tricking yourself in to believing a false reality. You will readily pass any lie detector test, no matter how advanced, because mentally/physiologically: you become the lie. This is probably why so many actors end up fucked in the head, long-term, but that's a story for another day.
[–] PsyOp 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
These new, more invasive, examinations are designed to bypass the conscious mind and directly analyze the subconscious responses to various stimuli...so, whilst one may be able to "trick" oneself into "believing" a lie, ones subconscious mind knows the truth, and it is that truth which these examinations are designed to ferret out. These new state-of-the-art polygraph technologies have taken decades, and billions of dollars, to develop...the common shmo/criminal doesn't stand a chance. And, even if an individual is a sociopath/psychopath, or has undergone training in order to defeat the examination, the examination, by it's very nature, will quickly reveal these variables and the individual will be rejected (if s/he is going for a position in which highly-classified materials are being handled) and placed on a watch-list for the rest of his/her life.
[–] cjtendon ago
You're making poorly defined claims without including any links to background info that might substantiate part of your claims. I believe that there is a slender basis of fact to your wild claims, but I believe you are misrepresenting the facts badly.