You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
TLDR: It outclasses a 1080 (non-Ti) at about 15% faster, while being about that much more expensive too. Until more games come out that support the RTX raytracing, it's mostly an incremental update. They shrunk the dies again, they restructured their architecture, and it's made it that much more powerful at the same power draw/clocks.
Until RTX has been proven as something the industry is going to go with into the future (which is still unknown, Nvidia likes to keep coming up with proprietary standards), I'd say stay stick to maybe a 10-series card when prices drop. It should be the better value at that point for your cash.
Sort: Top
[–] el_shaddai 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
TLDR: It outclasses a 1080 (non-Ti) at about 15% faster, while being about that much more expensive too. Until more games come out that support the RTX raytracing, it's mostly an incremental update. They shrunk the dies again, they restructured their architecture, and it's made it that much more powerful at the same power draw/clocks.
Until RTX has been proven as something the industry is going to go with into the future (which is still unknown, Nvidia likes to keep coming up with proprietary standards), I'd say stay stick to maybe a 10-series card when prices drop. It should be the better value at that point for your cash.
[–] 14481738? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Seems there is more to series 2000 than just the raytracing argument.
Glad to see AMD at the bottom, performance-wise, where it belongs!
[–] aCuriousYahnz ago
this post doesn't please lisa sue >:(