You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] speedisavirus 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Which is a retarded theory because thermite wouldn't have anything to do with molten steel weeks later. Thermite is immediate and fast in it's chemical reaction. You would need prolonged heat. The kind of heat that would come from thousands and thousands of pounds of molten steel encapsulated in thousands and thousands of pounds of concrete that was heated for hours by burning jet fuel.


[–] HappyMealBullshit 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Jet fuel doesn't get steel hot enough to melt it in the first place so suggesting it was burning jet fuel that kept steel in a molten state for weeks is laughable. Basic science and logic proves it's impossible.


[–] speedisavirus 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

You comprehend that other things in those buildings burned, right? Perhaps, just maybe, some of it has a higher burn temperature?