You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] HappyMealBullshit 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Have you seen the pictures of the 9/11 cleanup where they were hauling away the rubble and there was still pools of molten steel weeks after the collapse happened? I think I remember that being a key piece of evidence for the nano-thermite/thermate theory as there was no other method of demolition that would keep steel hot enough to be in a molten state for weeks.

[–] TheIrieOne 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

She mentions that in the video.

[–] speedisavirus 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Which is a retarded theory because thermite wouldn't have anything to do with molten steel weeks later. Thermite is immediate and fast in it's chemical reaction. You would need prolonged heat. The kind of heat that would come from thousands and thousands of pounds of molten steel encapsulated in thousands and thousands of pounds of concrete that was heated for hours by burning jet fuel.

[–] HappyMealBullshit 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Jet fuel doesn't get steel hot enough to melt it in the first place so suggesting it was burning jet fuel that kept steel in a molten state for weeks is laughable. Basic science and logic proves it's impossible.