You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] badruns 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Probably because the amount of energy required to do that, and do it at an extreme range remotely, would be astronomically high. To the point where such a weapon just isn't feasible. Thats what always turned me off on the theory, but who knows, military 30 years ahead and all that. Better quality version that I'm watching now:


[–] TheIrieOne 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Frequencies I believe can destroy structures, I mean they make soldiers change step crossing bridges because there's cases of companies or regiments of soldiers marching in unison across bridges and collapsing it.