You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 4 points 7 points (+11|-4) ago 

If not sending our money to arabs means he's a jew puppet, then sending money to arabs means he was an arab puppet.

[–] Flour 4 points 4 points (+8|-4) ago 

The point is this: He could cut all aid in Israel, yet he only cuts the Palestinians. We all want Israel and the Palestinians to recieve no aid, yet he still funds the heebs.

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

yet he still funds the heebs.

Still, if he is a "jew puppet" for funding jews, then he also was an "arab puppet" for funding arabs.

[–] GapingAnus 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The US doing the bidding of Israel is the US being an israeli puppet.

[–] Laserchalk 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

The problem is the preferential treatment. Either give them both aid or none of them aid. I would definitely say he's sided with the Jews on this one.

[–] GoatyMcGoatface 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Gee what gave it away? Was it the video where he said we love Israel? Was it the pictures of him wearing a kippah?

[–] dias17se 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

If you had to choose between both, which one you think its worse ?

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I personally think that all muslims should be annihilated, any traces of islam be erased from history books and everybody who objects to that be set on fire.

Compared to the fast-breeding muslim rats whose only point of their existence is infecting as many people as they can with the bubonic plague that is islam, jews are annoying hemorrhoids at best.