You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago  (edited ago)

You are saying you don’t protect your network with WPA2? You just leave it unsecured? Or am I misunderstanding?

[–] thelma 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago 

anyone can get on my wireless and upload/download ... unsecured totally

[–] kalgon 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Problem is that it's your wireless

You're responsible for it, in some countries you can be held accountable for whatever happens with it

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That’s an interesting idea

[–] prairie 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

protect
WPA2

These two are not related.

[–] VoutGuy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Your greentext has no power here!

[–] NotHereForPizza 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Don't say things like that. It confuses them.

To them, inconvenience is what deters intrusion.

What you and others seem to be missing, as the original comment in this chain points out, is that deploying the smokescreen is eventually more effective. Those running and crafting the google algorithms, twitter, fb, etc. all understand with certainty that flooding a pool with lots of shit is much easier than trying to protect it with passwords or other flimsy obstacles.

Where do you think they got the idea?

[–] BLOODandHONOUR 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

That’s nice