[–] knightwarrior41 1 points 25 points (+26|-1) ago 

i want him to do something about it instead of talking like a parrot.he can tell sessions to investigate these conglomerates for stiffing free speech rights in the united states alone

[–] roznak 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

He does not have to do anything. His words are already damaging these Media because it forces them into be an anti-Trump and give free media exposure to the voters to vote for him.

[–] Charilko 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

While I do want to see anti-trust legislation used to hammer these Silicone Valley fuckheads into the dirt, that can wait until after the mid-terms so it doesn’t look as politically motivated. Trump merely calling it out is drawing a lot of attention to the issue, and hopefully, reigniting that righteous indignation that got him elected in the first place. We need to keep Congress.

[–] BentAxel 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And: Sessions is about to be given walking papers if he doesn't start doing his job. If things don't change by November, expect a huge change.

[–] eyeswim 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

He is a freaking genius. Really , he amazes me. GO TRUMP!!!

[–] knightwarrior41 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

He does not have to do anything. His words are already damaging these Media because it forces them into be an anti-Trump and give free media exposure to the voters to vote for him.

what? he is doing something by rallying support? no people need to see concrete actions instead of tweets because right now the freedom of the speech has been diminished if not wounded on the public arena.you are mostly thinking of the next elections.news flash to you we got 2 houses of republican majority and a sitting republican president and the supreme court is also leaning towards the right....so what else do you think it must be done to make the internet great again? another round of elections???

[–] MrShekelstein 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Hes hinted at an internet bill of rights.

Right now hes gaining public support for it.

[–] knightwarrior41 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Hes hinted at an internet bill of rights.

do we really need that? i think that our current bill of rights covers that up nicely.he just have to make a phone call to his buddy sessions and lets see where the rabbit hole goes

[–] talmoridor-x 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Oh, he will. Don't worry.

[–] knightwarrior41 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Oh, he will. Don't worry.

time is ticking in this issue

[–] cantaloupe6 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Helping to ensure the proper thoughts are had: CNN, Soros, Rosenstein, payment processors, social media giants. Managing one's social credit score.

Beaker browser peer to peer  https://www.bitchute.com/video/WYSLC3YXbcw/

[–] The_Venerable 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

They are trying to find evidence of Russia meddling while THEY'RE the ones meddling. This fucking world. Democrats are terrorists. This shit needs to stop.

[–] HyperbolicGasChamber 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

It's jewish projection. They'll accuse you of what they are actually doing.

[–] wigson 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

The jew cries out as he attacks.

[–] Flour 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

They’re done with Russia. Now it’s just Trump is corrupt

[–] carlip 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241

its not just silencing, its illegal.

[–] BlueDrache 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Interesting ... I didn't know about this.

[–] carlip 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

yea i found it the other day while looking up some supreme court cases. Im trying to figure out how the recent South Dakota v. Wayfair could be used to argue facebook has a presence in every state and then use this law to sue them, seeking punitive damages of millions of dollars, for banning me. same with twitter, apple et al. Perhaps class action?

[–] Runaway-White-Slave 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I don't think so, first we had the BBS message boards, the chat rooms, then we had the www. sites, then we had the comment sections, then we had Yahoo & AOL with all their perks, we had Myspace, Facebook, etc....

They all had their coding done in such a way as to teach people too, that's why some social media pages and some businesses are so large, some people had and kept their shit together. That's almost like how modern corporations were formed too.

So yes maybe some people have a louder voice, but they've earned it, and the others are cucked or lazy Betas any-fucking-way.

[–] sbt2160p 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

These cucks literally can't remember a time before Facebook.

Like how they can't imagine any successful White Western nations having existed before 1950.

[–] Adminstrater 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I don't use Twitter because I know my thoughts are not welcome. I am being silenced on Twitter because of their anti-conservative platform.

I am essentially banned before I even begin. Which is why I prefer Voat. I may hold a wrong opinion, but I wont be banned for my wrong opinion.

I am one of Trump's silenced "millions".

[–] talmoridor-x 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

inb4 the NWO gains complete control over the internet, pretending to protect "free speech"

[–] RicardoBronson 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That's exactly what I'm concerned about. We already have the right to free speech - why do we need some new bill? What's really going on here?

[–] RemoteViewer1 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Kid Fucking Faggots like @Jack and Zuckerburg will hang for what they’ve done ,. Let alone what they keep attempting to do .

[–] a_fucking_dude 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The timing. All at once. There is a potential felony conspiracy here. Conspiracy is a crime in and of itself. Someone needs to get serious about this.

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)