You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
-4

[–] go1dfish 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago 

So this is another case of attempting to solve a problem caused by government intervention with more government intervention?

Great plan

0
4

[–] something_went_wrong 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The reason why there are borders and why borders must exist: our country's government intervening to solve a problem caused by another country's government.

Edit: striking irrelevant commentary

0
4

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

So the US government should allow China to keep pumping our country full of subsidized solar panels?

1
-1

[–] go1dfish 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

We can’t and shouldn’t force other nations to be free, we can only stop punishing our fellow citizens with our own government.

So yes, if China wants to indirectly subsidize the solar energy of American homes why should our government steal those savings from our citizens?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] go1dfish 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I’m not following with what you are trying to get at with your example I’m co fused there.

In any case the companies in your example certainly do not force themselves inbwtween a company and all of its potential customers in a geographic reason the way government does.

Most people don’t think companies have the right to force themselves into interactions between third parties but you seem to think this is acceptable for government.

If a company wants to sell something at a loss that is their prerogative and it is a common practice.