Showing removed comments by moderators for subverse: subverserequest

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

PuttItOut removed 3.7 years ago on 9/22/2015 4:39:05 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

PuttItOut removed 3.7 years ago on 9/22/2015 4:38:58 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

[–]mgeer10 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago

SRS brigaders CAUGHT! Here's the list of SRS assholes from reddit and some are sock puppets of jrandom

jrandom

nadrewod

dannydale

ireportspammers (sockpuppet account of jrandom)

RedSocks157

dubbelnougat

Absolem

codyave

dubbelnougat

MisterDave

Arotaes_Forgehammer

anytime you see these assholes, IMMEDIATELY DOWNVOAT and/or report as spam. they are the ones ACTIVELY CENSORING VOAT and working on downvoat brigades trying to ban and censor anything that doesn't fit their SJW feminist agenda. give these fags a healthy FUCK YOU and let them know you support FREE SPEECH ON VOAT!

all their comments are the same because they are copy/pasted by each other. and they hang out in v/reportspammers just like they do on reddit. exact same tactics. exact same result.

nobody should be censored for speaking their mind, BUT if a group is SYSTEMATICALLY TRYING TO CENSOR VOAT then they should be removed, banned, censored, etc.

now these piece of shit assholes also have SJW feminists in mod positions so that’s how they maintain their censorship privileges. they also will delete posts and make false accusations against manhood academy, but ask yourself this question:

if they are telling the truth, then why are they avoiding a LIVE UNCENSORED DEBATE about these accusations?

we are acting in good faith because we know we are telling the TRUTH and can PROVE IT. we are willing to air this publicly and tell our side face to face over webcam and then post the results (while keeping their identities anonymous). they can’t because they are LYING TO YOU GUYS. the best they can do is use the mods to make bullshit lies up about manhood academy and then post them because they know they can always CENSOR the replies.

example of one of their most common lies: manhood academy is a SCAM BRO!! DON'T GO THERE!! THEY ARE AFTER YOUR MONEY!!!!!

ok let’s go to their webpage….

"if you don't want to pay ATTEND FOR FREE!!!"

let me verify and check with their actual students ….yep! OVER HALF attend manhood academy for FREE and have done so literally for YEARS!

if the lie is so blatant and obvious from feminists keyboard warriors, why do they still try to pass it off as the truth??? why do they avoid LIVE debating their accusations??? why do they hide behind their keyboards pretending to care about voat when in reality they just want to CENSOR everyone that causes them butthurt?? why do they want to turn this site back into their reddit hell hole of political correctness???

SRS/SJW feminist critics: “WE WON’T DEBATE THEM BECAUSE MANHOOD ACADEMY IS FULL OF IMMATURE 12-YEAR-OLDS WHO JUST SCREAM FAGGOT!!! IT’S HATE SPEECH!!!”

once again, you see their lies typed behind their keyboards. why can’t they make these same accusations in person? because we’re too immature to debate them according to their feminist logic. ok so there’s no opportunity to defend ourselves and we just have to take their word for it?

SRS/SJW feminist critics: “WE’RE REALLY ON YOUR SIDE!!! WE’RE NOT SJW/SRS feminists!!! WE ARE JUST LIKE YOU!! MANHOOD ACADEMY IS LYING ABOUT US!!!”

ok great. accuse us FACE-TO-FACE in a LIVE DEBATE …oh that’s right. you can’t because we’re evil and immature. once again we see feminist logic: everyone who doesn’t agree with our feminist social justice warrior agenda is evil, hateful, and immature therefore you can automatically discount what they are saying.

DO YOU REALLY WANT VOAT IN THE HANDS OF THE PIECE OF SHIT COWARDS WHO DEMONIZE THE MESSENGER SO THEY CAN CENSOR THE MESSAGE?

DanielFlamino removed 3.7 years ago on 9/4/2015 9:26:15 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

[–]mgeer10 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago

SRS brigaders CAUGHT! Here's the list of SRS assholes from reddit and some are sock puppets of jrandom

jrandom

nadrewod

dannydale

ireportspammers (sockpuppet account of jrandom)

RedSocks157

dubbelnougat

Absolem

codyave

dubbelnougat

MisterDave

Arotaes_Forgehammer

anytime you see these assholes, IMMEDIATELY DOWNVOAT and/or report as spam. they are the ones ACTIVELY CENSORING VOAT and working on downvoat brigades trying to ban and censor anything that doesn't fit their SJW feminist agenda. give these fags a healthy FUCK YOU and let them know you support FREE SPEECH ON VOAT!

all their comments are the same because they are copy/pasted by each other. and they hang out in v/reportspammers just like they do on reddit. exact same tactics. exact same result.

nobody should be censored for speaking their mind, BUT if a group is SYSTEMATICALLY TRYING TO CENSOR VOAT then they should be removed, banned, censored, etc.

now these piece of shit assholes also have SJW feminists in mod positions so that’s how they maintain their censorship privileges. they also will delete posts and make false accusations against manhood academy, but ask yourself this question:

if they are telling the truth, then why are they avoiding a LIVE UNCENSORED DEBATE about these accusations?

we are acting in good faith because we know we are telling the TRUTH and can PROVE IT. we are willing to air this publicly and tell our side face to face over webcam and then post the results (while keeping their identities anonymous). they can’t because they are LYING TO YOU GUYS. the best they can do is use the mods to make bullshit lies up about manhood academy and then post them because they know they can always CENSOR the replies.

example of one of their most common lies: manhood academy is a SCAM BRO!! DON'T GO THERE!! THEY ARE AFTER YOUR MONEY!!!!!

ok let’s go to their webpage….

"if you don't want to pay ATTEND FOR FREE!!!"

let me verify and check with their actual students ….yep! OVER HALF attend manhood academy for FREE and have done so literally for YEARS!

if the lie is so blatant and obvious from feminists keyboard warriors, why do they still try to pass it off as the truth??? why do they avoid LIVE debating their accusations??? why do they hide behind their keyboards pretending to care about voat when in reality they just want to CENSOR everyone that causes them butthurt?? why do they want to turn this site back into their reddit hell hole of political correctness???

SRS/SJW feminist critics: “WE WON’T DEBATE THEM BECAUSE MANHOOD ACADEMY IS FULL OF IMMATURE 12-YEAR-OLDS WHO JUST SCREAM FAGGOT!!! IT’S HATE SPEECH!!!”

once again, you see their lies typed behind their keyboards. why can’t they make these same accusations in person? because we’re too immature to debate them according to their feminist logic. ok so there’s no opportunity to defend ourselves and we just have to take their word for it?

SRS/SJW feminist critics: “WE’RE REALLY ON YOUR SIDE!!! WE’RE NOT SJW/SRS feminists!!! WE ARE JUST LIKE YOU!! MANHOOD ACADEMY IS LYING ABOUT US!!!”

ok great. accuse us FACE-TO-FACE in a LIVE DEBATE …oh that’s right. you can’t because we’re evil and immature. once again we see feminist logic: everyone who doesn’t agree with our feminist social justice warrior agenda is evil, hateful, and immature therefore you can automatically discount what they are saying.

DO YOU REALLY WANT VOAT IN THE HANDS OF THE PIECE OF SHIT COWARDS WHO DEMONIZE THE MESSENGER SO THEY CAN CENSOR THE MESSAGE?

DanielFlamino removed 3.7 years ago on 9/4/2015 9:23:43 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

[–]mgeer10 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago

SRS brigaders CAUGHT! Here's the list of SRS assholes from reddit and some are sock puppets of jrandom

jrandom

nadrewod

dannydale

ireportspammers (sockpuppet account of jrandom)

RedSocks157

dubbelnougat

Absolem

codyave

dubbelnougat

MisterDave

Arotaes_Forgehammer

anytime you see these assholes, IMMEDIATELY DOWNVOAT and/or report as spam. they are the ones ACTIVELY CENSORING VOAT and working on downvoat brigades trying to ban and censor anything that doesn't fit their SJW feminist agenda. give these fags a healthy FUCK YOU and let them know you support FREE SPEECH ON VOAT!

all their comments are the same because they are copy/pasted by each other. and they hang out in v/reportspammers just like they do on reddit. exact same tactics. exact same result.

nobody should be censored for speaking their mind, BUT if a group is SYSTEMATICALLY TRYING TO CENSOR VOAT then they should be removed, banned, censored, etc.

now these piece of shit assholes also have SJW feminists in mod positions so that’s how they maintain their censorship privileges. they also will delete posts and make false accusations against manhood academy, but ask yourself this question:

if they are telling the truth, then why are they avoiding a LIVE UNCENSORED DEBATE about these accusations?

we are acting in good faith because we know we are telling the TRUTH and can PROVE IT. we are willing to air this publicly and tell our side face to face over webcam and then post the results (while keeping their identities anonymous). they can’t because they are LYING TO YOU GUYS. the best they can do is use the mods to make bullshit lies up about manhood academy and then post them because they know they can always CENSOR the replies.

example of one of their most common lies: manhood academy is a SCAM BRO!! DON'T GO THERE!! THEY ARE AFTER YOUR MONEY!!!!!

ok let’s go to their webpage….

"if you don't want to pay ATTEND FOR FREE!!!"

let me verify and check with their actual students ….yep! OVER HALF attend manhood academy for FREE and have done so literally for YEARS!

if the lie is so blatant and obvious from feminists keyboard warriors, why do they still try to pass it off as the truth??? why do they avoid LIVE debating their accusations??? why do they hide behind their keyboards pretending to care about voat when in reality they just want to CENSOR everyone that causes them butthurt?? why do they want to turn this site back into their reddit hell hole of political correctness???

SRS/SJW feminist critics: “WE WON’T DEBATE THEM BECAUSE MANHOOD ACADEMY IS FULL OF IMMATURE 12-YEAR-OLDS WHO JUST SCREAM FAGGOT!!! IT’S HATE SPEECH!!!”

once again, you see their lies typed behind their keyboards. why can’t they make these same accusations in person? because we’re too immature to debate them according to their feminist logic. ok so there’s no opportunity to defend ourselves and we just have to take their word for it?

SRS/SJW feminist critics: “WE’RE REALLY ON YOUR SIDE!!! WE’RE NOT SJW/SRS feminists!!! WE ARE JUST LIKE YOU!! MANHOOD ACADEMY IS LYING ABOUT US!!!”

ok great. accuse us FACE-TO-FACE in a LIVE DEBATE …oh that’s right. you can’t because we’re evil and immature. once again we see feminist logic: everyone who doesn’t agree with our feminist social justice warrior agenda is evil, hateful, and immature therefore you can automatically discount what they are saying.

DO YOU REALLY WANT VOAT IN THE HANDS OF THE PIECE OF SHIT COWARDS WHO DEMONIZE THE MESSENGER SO THEY CAN CENSOR THE MESSAGE?

DanielFlamino removed 3.7 years ago on 9/4/2015 9:23:39 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

moe removed 3.8 years ago on 8/27/2015 3:14:18 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

moe removed 3.8 years ago on 8/27/2015 3:13:55 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

moe removed 3.8 years ago on 8/27/2015 3:13:52 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

DanielFlamino removed 3.8 years ago on 8/27/2015 3:13:48 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

DanielFlamino removed 3.8 years ago on 8/27/2015 3:13:37 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

DanielFlamino removed 3.8 years ago on 8/27/2015 3:13:20 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

I would like to take over askvoat by N2theoah in subverserequest

[–]deleted 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

You are a disingenuous and manipulative nutjob. Turn off the internet and go outside.

DanielFlamino removed 3.8 years ago on 8/13/2015 12:33:51 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

Requesting /v/burningman by bigmeanpoopiepants in subverserequest

[–]deleted 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

Can't believe you're doing this without even trying to notify people. Just seems wrong to me. I guess the lesson should be that no matter what you do you don't have any say in content created for other peoples websites like voat or reddit, it isn't worth putting in effort to build a sub because it can be snatched away any time.

I am disappointed beyond measure.

PuttItOut removed 3.8 years ago on 7/24/2015 8:34:07 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

Requesting /v/talesfromtechsupport Admin was never active by ibib in subverserequest

[–]deleted 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago

Voat's new censorship

Downvoating is what reddit uses to silence dissenting views.

People don't typically upvoat, even if they like something. They will just look at it.

But when people get butthurt or see things they don't like they DO DOWNVOAT. You're assuming that people use both buttons the same way.

Voating is a censorship tool because it doesn't depend on rational argumentation. It only depends on CONSENSUS. That's why SRS use downvoat brigades because they know it's only purpose is to censor content they don't want seen by others.

Look, our entire political system should make it more practical. We don't let everyone vote in elections for a good reason: we know that retards are the majority of people. You want Bill Gate's educated vote negated by some homeless retard on the street? That's EXACTLY what democratic voting does. That's exactly what the movie Idiocracy was about. When you give everyone an equal say, you negate the point of education. You negate the point of rational argumentation. If a baby can negate the vote of an adult, then you don't really need to learn how to think. All you need to do is make people agree with you. And bribery is the fastest way to agreement.

Since people tend to downvoat when they're butthurt and engaged in censorship, the best way to combat censorship would be to only allow UPVOATING since people will actively have to champion what they believe rather than focus on what they want to complain about and censor. You can look at upvoating as positive censorship since it at least puts the burden on the upvoater to be accountable to their views and say what they prefer instead of simply complaining about what they don't want.

Stating what you want to happen takes EDUCATION AND EFFORT. Complaining about what you don't want just requires the ability to be butthurt.

I'd rather err on the side of positive censorship if we have to censor at all. We already know how negative censorship turns out: it becomes reddit.

At least positive censorship requires EFFORT that keyboard warriors aren't willing to invest. So if we want to make this place different from reddit, we should ONLY have an upvoat button.

And while we're at it, let's remove the scores from the profiles so keyboard warriors who are already socially retarded don't start jerking off to their fake internet power.

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/20/2015 11:13:03 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

PSA: None of these requests are being transferred. by Throwaway321 in subverserequest

[–]deleted 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

How to put a bitch in check: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Fj8JkfhP4

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:28:24 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

PSA: None of these requests are being transferred. by Throwaway321 in subverserequest

[–]deleted 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

How to put a bitch in check: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Fj8JkfhP4

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:28:21 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:28:18 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

PSA: None of these requests are being transferred. by Throwaway321 in subverserequest

[–]deleted 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

u sound mad faggot retard LOL! :) cry harder little sissy faggot lol!

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:28:15 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

PSA: None of these requests are being transferred. by Throwaway321 in subverserequest

[–]deleted 14 points -14 points (+0|-14) ago

Voat's new censorship

Downvoating is what reddit uses to silence dissenting views.

People don't typically upvoat, even if they like something. They will just look at it.

But when people get butthurt or see things they don't like they DO DOWNVOAT. You're assuming that people use both buttons the same way.

Voating is a censorship tool because it doesn't depend on rational argumentation. It only depends on CONSENSUS. That's why SRS use downvoat brigades because they know it's only purpose is to censor content they don't want seen by others.

Look, our entire political system should make it more practical. We don't let everyone vote in elections for a good reason: we know that retards are the majority of people. You want Bill Gate's educated vote negated by some homeless retard on the street? That's EXACTLY what democratic voting does. That's exactly what the movie Idiocracy was about. When you give everyone an equal say, you negate the point of education. You negate the point of rational argumentation. If a baby can negate the vote of an adult, then you don't really need to learn how to think. All you need to do is make people agree with you. And bribery is the fastest way to agreement.

Since people tend to downvoat when they're butthurt and engaged in censorship, the best way to combat censorship would be to only allow UPVOATING since people will actively have to champion what they believe rather than focus on what they want to complain about and censor. You can look at upvoating as positive censorship since it at least puts the burden on the upvoater to be accountable to their views and say what they prefer instead of simply complaining about what they don't want.

Stating what you want to happen takes EDUCATION AND EFFORT. Complaining about what you don't want just requires the ability to be butthurt.

I'd rather err on the side of positive censorship if we have to censor at all. We already know how negative censorship turns out: it becomes reddit.

At least positive censorship requires EFFORT that keyboard warriors aren't willing to invest. So if we want to make this place different from reddit, we should ONLY have an upvoat button.

And while we're at it, let's remove the scores from the profiles so keyboard warriors who are already socially retarded don't start jerking off to their fake internet power.

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:28:02 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

[–]deleted [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

Voat's new censorship

Downvoating is what reddit uses to silence dissenting views.

People don't typically upvoat, even if they like something. They will just look at it.

But when people get butthurt or see things they don't like they DO DOWNVOAT. You're assuming that people use both buttons the same way.

Voating is a censorship tool because it doesn't depend on rational argumentation. It only depends on CONSENSUS. That's why SRS use downvoat brigades because they know it's only purpose is to censor content they don't want seen by others.

Look, our entire political system should make it more practical. We don't let everyone vote in elections for a good reason: we know that retards are the majority of people. You want Bill Gate's educated vote negated by some homeless retard on the street? That's EXACTLY what democratic voting does. That's exactly what the movie Idiocracy was about. When you give everyone an equal say, you negate the point of education. You negate the point of rational argumentation. If a baby can negate the vote of an adult, then you don't really need to learn how to think. All you need to do is make people agree with you. And bribery is the fastest way to agreement.

Since people tend to downvoat when they're butthurt and engaged in censorship, the best way to combat censorship would be to only allow UPVOATING since people will actively have to champion what they believe rather than focus on what they want to complain about and censor. You can look at upvoating as positive censorship since it at least puts the burden on the upvoater to be accountable to their views and say what they prefer instead of simply complaining about what they don't want.

Stating what you want to happen takes EDUCATION AND EFFORT. Complaining about what you don't want just requires the ability to be butthurt.

I'd rather err on the side of positive censorship if we have to censor at all. We already know how negative censorship turns out: it becomes reddit.

At least positive censorship requires EFFORT that keyboard warriors aren't willing to invest. So if we want to make this place different from reddit, we should ONLY have an upvoat button.

And while we're at it, let's remove the scores from the profiles so keyboard warriors who are already socially retarded don't start jerking off to their fake internet power.

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:19:22 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

[–]deleted [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:19:18 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

[–]deleted [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:18:56 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

deleted by user by [deleted] in subverserequest

[–]deleted [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/16/2015 1:18:50 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

Requesting /v/RCT by Krutonium in subverserequest

[–]deleted 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

DanielFlamino removed 3.9 years ago on 7/9/2015 1:01:29 AM

"This feature is not yet implemented"

Requesting /v/frugal only mod inactive for 8 months by espresso_patronum in subverserequest

[–]deleted 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

Hello, when I requested this there was no such rule in place at that time.

I would think that I would be grandfathered in, since my request came prior to this rule existing.

here is a snapshot of how this looked at the time I requested this:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150418124611/https://voat.co/v/subverserequest/

PuttItOut removed 3.9 years ago on 6/29/2015 9:13:30 PM

"This feature is not yet implemented"