You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] leixiaotie 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If you sit on @PuttItOut side, it is true that /u/she does not violate any rules given at subverse request. However there are "WAYS" to workaround this.

"Site-wide Policy" change. Currently voat has no "site-wide policy" or anything at all. Now @PuttItOut and @Atko can start to define site-wide policy and apply it in matter of times. Some rules can start as subjective, then redefined into something more objective as it progress. Say that if they apply the following rules: "Involving other organization outside voat for specific matters without authorization from administrator will result in severe punishment". That rules itself can be applied to strip the ownership.

0
0

[–] EIMR 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Do you really want them to change rules so that a specific person can't mod? That won't end well.

0
1

[–] leixiaotie 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

No, but make it more "general" that it seems "politically" valid. Such in my example above, "politically" it is correct to avoid asking other organization for internal voat issue. Beside how evil this way is, it is the things that common being used in society.

0
0

[–] heili 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

They want to change the site code so that a specific person's current CCP problem goes away.