You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] flope_de 6 points 42 points (+48|-6) ago 

I was actually linked here from a thread in /v/AskVoat :).

You'll only have to look at her three lowest ranked comment to see why people are concerned.

She thinks normal people are unable to understand, and should not discuss, issues transvestites might have..

She defends feminism, and ideology based around female supremacy, and sexism and gender discrimination against men.

She defends the SJW culture, a movement known for bullying and silencing people who do not share their worldview.


[–] SpaceRosa 12 points 4 points (+16|-12) ago 

That's not true. You're spinning it.

The first link is "I don't understand why people talk about issues they don't know about." Not "You should not discuss trans issues". You're just lying about what it is, or maybe you're deliberately choosing that interpretation.

The second one is difficult to judge; the topic was deleted, so I don't know what that was a response to.

Third? Defending SJW culture? She said "it's the boogeyman", and you know, she's right. Look at all the downvotes this thread has got because someone who didn't know what they were talking about used the word SJW. All this fear for no reason. SJW is the new boogeyman, at least here. It's not defending it to have an opinion on the word.

Or are you saying she shouldn't be allowed the subverse because she has opinions you don't like?


[–] pikeymick 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

How can one learn more about an issue without discussing it. Voat is an environment where anyone is ALLOWED to talk about whatever they want without having to worry about being censored for not being as in the know. That's the whole point of conversation. Shaming someone for not knowing as much does nothing to enhance the community. It's using knowledge as a weapon, not a characteristic I ever want to see in a leader.

Second again, shaming someone, not a leadership characteristic.

Third a moderator should not be enforcing their own opinion! They are there to moderate a community, not making their personal safe place.


[–] Icy-Defiance 9 points 3 points (+12|-9) ago  (edited ago)

If feminism is about female supremacy then gamergate is about male supremacy and FPH is about literally killing fat people. And I say that as a gamergate supporter and someone who seriously despises the SJW mentality.

And to see that third link as defending anything, your mind must be seriously warped, especially if you look at it in context.

The first link is the only one that is bad, but if you look at the replies to it, she listened to the feedback and said she'd keep it in mind.


[–] flope_de 5 points 7 points (+12|-5) ago 

This is not a debate or an argument, and we are not discussing me, or gamer gate, or feminism.


[–] FFX01 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Please re-read the comment you are replying to.

She defends feminism, and ideology based around female supremacy

Notice the AND. He is not saying feminism supports female supremacy.