You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

5
53

[–] Ripley_Riae 5 points 53 points (+58|-5) ago 

SJW'ers shouldn't be given control of primary subverses.

Voat was created with free speech and Anti Censorship in mind, She's SJW leanings will inevitably lead to censorship at some point

19
-10

[–] ChillyHellion 19 points -10 points (+9|-19) ago 

Then we'll have to confront those wrongs when they occur. We can't deny someone from a valid process just because they "might do something wrong later". Or even if they will do something wrong later. We're not the thought police here. If someone violates Voat's terms of service, they're banned. If they mistreat the community, we can as a community take action, move to another subverse, do whatever we feel we need to within the limits of Voat's TOS. But we shouldn't deny someone their rightful process just because we disagree with their views. If we do that then we're just the same as Reddit. I'd rather be better.

0
9

[–] frankenmine 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Being a mod is a privilege, not a right, and someone with professed SJW ideology does not deserve that privilege, because they oppose free speech as a core belief.

[–] [deleted] 28 points -17 points (+11|-28) ago 

[Deleted]

1
29

[–] Ripley_Riae 1 points 29 points (+30|-1) ago 

She is a self proclaimed SJW

https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/comments/318060/1205737

So yeah

4
15

[–] Scandinavian 4 points 15 points (+19|-4) ago  (edited ago)

Sorry, you're wrong. Please review the condescending and sexist remarks made on its profile page. It's readily available for all.