[–] [deleted] 13 points 294 points (+307|-13) ago 

[Deleted]

1
73

[–] cynoclast 1 points 73 points (+74|-1) ago 

Seconded. The SJW cancer is why I left reddit. There are other alternatives out there.

44
-7

44
-18

8
147

[–] flope_de 8 points 147 points (+155|-8) ago 

I do not think /u/she would be a fitting head mod for /v/AskVoat, because her comment history indicates that she might be opposed to the core values of voat and the AskVoat community.

26
-9

35
-12

2
109

[–] PuttItOut 2 points 109 points (+111|-2) ago 

I'll review this request personally. Until I have time please be civilized. This is obviously a big concern to the community and thus to me.

Soon.

6
89

[–] Ripley_Riae 6 points 89 points (+95|-6) ago 

Thanks Putitout.

I'd just like to say that She has only been a member for 2 months. Is she really the most qualified to take care of such a large subverse within your community?

It's also worth noting that her CCP is much lower than what I think is appropriate for such a role, I've been here roughly 2 weeks and i've already got double the CCP as She.

Her SJW leanings (Has openly announced herself as a SJW) is a big worry for many of us within the community. Although she has openly said that subverses like FatPeopleHate don't necessarily break any laws and risk the shutting down of our servers she DOES say that she thinks that subverses that damage Voats growth in any way and therefore risk the platform for free speech that we all want should be removed from the site.

It is also worth mentioning she threw FatPeopleHate and put it in the same category as Coontown... as if to say that we're as bad as those filthy racists... That is why there's worry.

And yes, having scrolled through about 25-30 pages of her comments I can agree with some others that she is a tad snappy and quick to insult when shutting down other peoples opinions if she disagrees with them

(Can I also quickly take a moment to mention the irony of her saying that non trans people should refrain from commenting on such subjects when she is in fact a non trans individual)

1
26

[–] Al_Rubyx 1 points 26 points (+27|-1) ago 

she seems about as sane as an sjw can get. Still, no.

0
19

[–] flope_de 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

Thank you for considering our concerns.

1
14

[–] HowAboutShutUp 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago  (edited ago)

As a nobody end user, I can't support the approval of this person to subverse owner. Nothing against them, I just don't think they'd do a good job based on what other users have brought up. It's somewhat immaterial to me, though.

[–] [deleted] 3 points 14 points (+17|-3) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
13

[–] PuttItOut 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

I don't know why you got downvoted for this as it's verifiably true. Everything will be done, "Soon [as possible, trust me, I'm working on it.]"

8
89

[–] Scandinavian 8 points 89 points (+97|-8) ago  (edited ago)

@atko, @puttitout : Don't fall for this. Don't transfer AskVoat to someone who's not here to contribute to the community, but to ruin it like they did Reddit.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 70 points (+71|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

5
53

[–] Ripley_Riae 5 points 53 points (+58|-5) ago 

SJW'ers shouldn't be given control of primary subverses.

Voat was created with free speech and Anti Censorship in mind, She's SJW leanings will inevitably lead to censorship at some point

19
-10

1
47

[–] neonneophyte 1 points 47 points (+48|-1) ago 

I don't need feminists who use terms like "whiny entitled men" owning a main sub. They completely ruined reddit, it's why many of us are here.

6
43

[–] 1292840 6 points 43 points (+49|-6) ago 

After reviewing the posting history for /u/she I'd have to agree with /u/nomerasques /u/she shouldn't be given control of this sub. SJW slacktivists should not be allowed control over primary subverses.

[–] [deleted] 10 points -1 points (+9|-10) ago 

[Deleted]

0
8

[–] FFX01 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

SJWs are pro-censorship.

2
1

[–] Muraenidae 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

I'm curious too. I just want to know what both sides are thinking so I can get the whole picture. I agree with the general consensus of this thread, but I find it ironic that anyone here asking "why?" is getting down voted by people who are anti-censorship. They aren't solving any problems, just letting them grow stagnant. They're just making the censorship work for them.

load more comments ▼ (17 remaining)