You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] 2029918? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

My point is that there are overlapping themes in the parts, and that you are attempting to analyze themes and purposes on incomplete data. That is all I'm saying. Sorry to have angered you.

0
0

[–] smokratez [S] ago 

Then go make a post talking about the whole book. I am only talking about the first part. You didn't anger me. You are making yourself look dumb.

1
0

[–] 2030854? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I have no interest in making a post about the book. I was only trying to defend Asimov from what to me seemed an uninformed account of a mere fragment of his excellent story.

As for looking dumb, I care not how others perceive me. I believe my responses so far have been calm and informed, only made in the attempt to make the theme of this book lucid. If I have failed, alas, I'll move on. I'm done with this debate now, for I have no interest in being further insulted for having my say.