You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
0

[–] 2029490? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You began to analyze and question the point of the story before reading two thirds of said story. That's why people are telling you to read the rest--it will make more sense to you that way

0
0

[–] smokratez [S] ago 

I analysed the first part. That is all I did. I didn't analyse the whole book while leaving parts out. I only talked about the first part.

0
1

[–] 2029918? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

My point is that there are overlapping themes in the parts, and that you are attempting to analyze themes and purposes on incomplete data. That is all I'm saying. Sorry to have angered you.