You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
2

[–] beard0 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

And I said it would be foolish to read the first and decide you understand the rest. Further, I'm saying that Asimov is making the same point. You are Hallam and the irony is delicious.

0
0

[–] smokratez [S] ago  (edited ago)

Since I even haven't read the rest and said I haven't, your statement is retarded. You are saying I am talking about something I am not. Making you the retard.

0
1

[–] 2028294? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

All harshness aside here, I think /u/beard0 has a point about what the point truly was. Again, I would strongly advise reading the next two parts (if you can get past the incredible strangeness and uniqueness--quite Beyond Asimov's usual caliber)