14
34

[–] geovoat 14 points 34 points (+48|-14) ago  (edited ago)

Gotta tell you that starting to eliminate what a mod might think of as psuedoscience and getting more and more particular about that kind of thing is what made r/science go to hell over at deaddit.

Darwin was a hack until he wasnt.

40
-19

[–] [deleted] 17 points 27 points (+44|-17) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] KyJoCaThe2nd 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Right, is a comment off-topic if it isn't about the submission, or is it off-topic if it's intentionally derailing a comment thread.

[–] [deleted] 19 points 25 points (+44|-19) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Was anyone even posting these? Can't remember having seen any.

0
2

[–] Disappointed 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Some of the ideas seem to have been brewing for a while.

https://voat.co/v/science/comments/435962

Load more comments to see the old rules discussion.

[–] [deleted] 22 points 22 points (+44|-22) ago 

[Deleted]

16
3

[–] Teh_Sauce_Guy [S] 16 points 3 points (+19|-16) ago 

Lol. You take a single statement and manage to pull a universe of bullshit out of it. I was talking about the software of the website. I was not aware that second level moderators had access to the ban function until I looked at the ban logs.

20
20

[–] pandabill 20 points 20 points (+40|-20) ago 

I'd rather let the votes decide. What do you think about this crazy approach?

8
14

[–] Cuckbot 8 points 14 points (+22|-8) ago 

@Atko @PuttitOut these are the new rules for your system sub apparently.

9
13

[–] Disappointed 9 points 13 points (+22|-9) ago  (edited ago)

Are you all aware user voting for mods is coming as per this post(see link)?

There's also a message for all mods under @system level 1 control from the admin there as well.

https://voat.co/v/announcements/comments/729257

9
12

[–] heili 9 points 12 points (+21|-9) ago 

You come off like a dick in this post.

14
-7
load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)