You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

8
-3

[–] BustyChicksFTW 8 points -3 points (+5|-8) ago  (edited ago)

Actually, scientifically speaking and mathematically observing, we'll kill more than the Permian extinction (75% terrestrial species and 95% of aquatic species) at the rhythm that we're going at. There is even a calculated small chance that we end up a barren world like Mars due to vicious cycles and chain reactions.

Edit: Welp the downvotes sadden me since those are scientific theories with actual numbers and Voat is supposed to be open-minded and a free speech platform but hey. Whatever I guess.

0
6

[–] mamwad 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Have any citations for those numbers?

6
-4

[–] BustyChicksFTW 6 points -4 points (+2|-6) ago  (edited ago)

http://www.britannica.com/science/Permian-extinction (let's please not accuse Britannica of conspiracies or Jew loving as per Voat etiquette)

0
1

[–] Truly 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You ever find the numbers to back up your claims? The projection that this will be worse than the permian extinction?