You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]BustyChicksFTW8 points
-3 points
5 points
(+5|-8)
ago
(edited ago)
Actually, scientifically speaking and mathematically observing, we'll kill more than the Permian extinction (75% terrestrial species and 95% of aquatic species) at the rhythm that we're going at. There is even a calculated small chance that we end up a barren world like Mars due to vicious cycles and chain reactions.
Edit: Welp the downvotes sadden me since those are scientific theories with actual numbers and Voat is supposed to be open-minded and a free speech platform but hey. Whatever I guess.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] mamwad 2 points 9 points 11 points (+11|-2) ago (edited ago)
Why don't we nip the problem in the bud before we kill 90% of the species on earth? Trust me, that won't be a fun time.
[–] BustyChicksFTW 8 points -3 points 5 points (+5|-8) ago (edited ago)
Actually, scientifically speaking and mathematically observing, we'll kill more than the Permian extinction (75% terrestrial species and 95% of aquatic species) at the rhythm that we're going at. There is even a calculated small chance that we end up a barren world like Mars due to vicious cycles and chain reactions.
Edit: Welp the downvotes sadden me since those are scientific theories with actual numbers and Voat is supposed to be open-minded and a free speech platform but hey. Whatever I guess.
[–] mamwad 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Have any citations for those numbers?
[–] Truly 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You ever find the numbers to back up your claims? The projection that this will be worse than the permian extinction?