You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

4
19

[–] 3986561? 4 points 19 points (+23|-4) ago  (edited ago)

"The NOAA is controlled by Jews who use Hollywood to perpetuate a myth that the tens of billions of tons of greenhouse gasses mankind produces every year are having an effect on the climate. Instead, the truth is that the independently verified, globally accepted change from ~250 parts-per-million of atmospheric CO2 concentration to ~350 PPM is caused because Jews want to turn white people into cucks for Arabs and leftists, and every researcher who has ever obtained an arctic ice core sample and put it into a gas chromatograph to obtain the historic CO2 concentration has just been paid off by dirty Jew money.

CO2 isn't being emitted by the agriculture, transportation, and manufacturing sectors, atmospheric CO2 concentrations haven't been rising, and even when I inconsistently admit they have been rising, it's due to a natural cycle and even though I dismiss the very concept of science, here's a fringe scientific article showing that this is natural, and even if it wasn't, greenhouse gases can't cause temperatures to rise. Jews."

1
5

[–] Sippio 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Beautiful. I just linked that same NOAA page to a climate denier in another thread. Instant downvote, followed by a graph spanning 5 million years suggesting a downward trend.

1
3

[–] tame 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

My father-in-law told me that there is literally a global conspiracy to "adjust" weather station readings so that they conform to the global warming narrative.

I wish I were making this up.

1
5

[–] 3987392? 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

People like that must lack imaginations, because I've never heard them foresee the following obvious problem: if there was a global conspiracy to present one weather narrative over another, think about how many well-intentioned researchers and normal people would publish seemingly innocuous data that inadvertently exposes the truth.

A zoologist studying the food availability for a specific type of finch in the Galapagos innocently publishes a paper showing that a dieoff of heat-sensitive krill is decreasing the finches' population, and some marine biologist five years later compiles 20,000 measurements from an automated oceanographic buoy and makes a causal link to increasing water temperatures. Imagine the sheer omniscience that would be required for a conspirator to make all this up; he'd have to control the lives and seemingly trivial publications of hundreds of thousands of researchers, interns, doctoral students, and people whose entire careers are tied to publishing accurate and sound studies. Just how powerful do conspiracy theorists think the puppet-masters are?

Scientists continually publish information that turns out only provides further evidence backing up anthropogenic global warming, even though they were only concerned with their own tiny corner of science. It's like a surgeon recording the locations of his Cholera patients as a matter of bureaucratic routine, and then someone coming along and realizing that it's actually a piece of evidence supporting germ theory. The surgeon didn't realize that he was actually producing the coordinates of a heat map centered around a local well, and similarly today's scientists are collecting data that nearly universally backs up the anthropogenic global warming theory.

The people who believe there's significant scientific debate over whether or not man-made global warming is occurring are simply ignorant of the scope of what's been observed and the meaning of the term "independently verifiable."

1
1

[–] HoocOtt 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

I don't know about global conspiracy but he is right about the adjustments:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/ushcn/ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg.gif

5
-2

[–] BustyChicksFTW 5 points -2 points (+3|-5) ago  (edited ago)

This comment literally gave me a headache. Jews this, jews that. Islam this, islam that. Christ Voat.

0
3

[–] rwbj 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Come on man. Read it again, and think.

edit: The " symbols at the start and end of the post ought be a hint if nothing else...

1
3

[–] Hairyballsack 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Freedom of speech here baby, deal wit it.

1
2

[–] 3986913? 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

That is precisely the idea, BustyChicksFTW. That is precisely the idea.

1
0

[–] 8bCvYq2vpg 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

It's an echo chamber because of the number of people we have here compared to other places.