You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

3
4

[–] indiglo_girls 3 points 4 points (+7|-3) ago 

Yep, that 130+ year record. In planetary terms that isn't even long enough to be considered a blink. Now, when it actually gets warmer than it has ever been, that's gonna be a hell of a problem, for whatever could survive those conditions.

2
9

[–] mamwad 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Why don't we nip the problem in the bud before we kill 90% of the species on earth? Trust me, that won't be a fun time.

8
-3

[–] BustyChicksFTW 8 points -3 points (+5|-8) ago  (edited ago)

Actually, scientifically speaking and mathematically observing, we'll kill more than the Permian extinction (75% terrestrial species and 95% of aquatic species) at the rhythm that we're going at. There is even a calculated small chance that we end up a barren world like Mars due to vicious cycles and chain reactions.

Edit: Welp the downvotes sadden me since those are scientific theories with actual numbers and Voat is supposed to be open-minded and a free speech platform but hey. Whatever I guess.